3 ms·
Wile I don't think they deserved to loose their lives over it, calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest. They were at the very least intentionally being a nui
by account42 10mo ago
Wile I don't think they deserved to loose their lives over it, calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest. They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process.
- kdkirsch 10mo agoSo now being a nuisance is justification for summary extrajudicial executions?! If people on HN believe this then we’re toast.
- zahlman 10mo agoThat is not at all the argument being made.
- JumpCrisscross 10mo ago> They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process Pretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor. There is lawbreaking in that videos. But the felony-level stuff is all from folks in uniform. (Which, thankfully, they’ve started wearing.)
- zahlman 10mo ago[flagged]
- maxehmookau 10mo agoBeing a nuisance is not illegal. In the eyes of the law, someone being a nuisance is, indeed, innocent - and to say so is not dishonest.
- mexicocitinluez 10mo ago> calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest You're not actually arguing that American citizens shouldn't be able to film the cops are you? That would be pretty un-American.
- zahlman 10mo ago[flagged]
- mexicocitinluez 10mo agoSo then what crime or behavior warranted that behavior from ICE?
- zahlman 10mo ago[flagged]
- mexicocitinluez 10mo agoStanding in the road? That's pathetic and absurd.