I'm back at my desk now, here's something from my current Claude session of it writing and running code. Are you saying yours cannot do this? Nawin.Auth i

I'm back at my desk now, here's something from my current Claude session of it writing and running code. Are you saying yours cannot do this? Nawin.Auth is running on 567. Let me write a quick test to capture exactly what bytes Nawin.Auth sends vs Crabbit (on 5670): ● Write(/tmp/compare_auth.py) ⎿ Wrote 83 lines to ../../../../tmp/compare_auth.py 1 #!/usr/bin/env python3 2 """Compare auth server responses byte-by-byte""" 3 import socket 4 5 def test_auth(host, port, name): 6 print(f"\n=== Testing {name} on {host}:{port} ===") 7 8 # Build AuthTreq request (141 bytes) 9 # type[1] + authid[28] + authdom[48] + chal[8] + hostid[28] + uid[28] 10 request = bytearray(141) … +73 lines (ctrl+o to expand) ● Bash(sudo lsof -i :5670 2>/dev/null | head -3) ⎿ COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME run-auth- 95646 root 9u IPv4 139735 0t0 TCP \*:5670 (LISTEN) ● Bash(python3 /tmp/compare_auth.py 2>&1) ⎿ === Testing Nawin.Auth on 127.0.0.1:567 === Request (141 bytes): Hex: 01676c656e6461000000000000000000000000000000000000000000006e6177696e00000000000000 … +53 lines (ctrl+o to expand) ● Both send 145 bytes, same format! Differences are only in the random session keys (bytes 64-72 and 136-144). The ticket encryption is identical.