5 ms·
Its crazy to me after all these years that django-like migrations aren't in every language. On the one hand they seem so straightforward and powerful, but there
by hansonkd 8mo ago
Its crazy to me after all these years that django-like migrations aren't in every language. On the one hand they seem so straightforward and powerful, but there must be some underlying complexities of having it autogenerate migrations.
Its always a surprise when i went to Elixir or Rust and the migration story was more complicated and manual compared to just changing a model, generating a migration and committing.
In the pre-LLM world, I was writing ecto files, and it was super repetitive to define make large database strucutres compared to Django.
- dnautics 8mo agowell in elixir you can have two schemas for the same table, which could represent different views, for example, an admin view and a user view. this is not (necessarily) for security but it reduces the number of columns fetched in the query to only what you need for the purpose.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- IceDane 8mo agoThere is no way to autogenerate migrations that work in all cases. There are lots of things out there that can generate migrations that work for most simple cases.
- etchalon 8mo agoDjango manages to autogenerate migrations that work in the VAST majority of cases.
- boxed 8mo agoThat's why you can do your own migrations in Django for those edge cases.
- frankwiles 8mo agoI end up needing to write a manual migration maybe once every other year in real world use.
- hansonkd 8mo agoThey don't need to work in every case. For the past `~15 years 100% of the autogenerated migrations to generating tables, columns or column names I have made just work. and i have made thousands of migrations at this point. The only thing to manually migrate are data migrations from one schema to the other.
- igsomething 8mo agoGoing from Django to Phoenix I prefer manual migrations. Despite being a bit tedious and repetitive, by doing a "double pass" on the schema I often catch bugs, typos, missing indexes, etc. that I would have missed with Django. You waste a bit of time on the simple schemas, but you save a ton of time when you are defining more complex ones. I lost count on how many bugs were introduced because someone was careless with Django migrations, and it is also surprising that some Django devs don't know how to translate the migrations to the SQL equivalent. At least you can opt-in to automated migrations in Elixir if you use Ash.
- limagnolia 8mo agoDjango doesn't force anyone to use the automatic migrations, you can always write them manually if you want to :)
- wiredfool 8mo agoThere are some subtle edge cases in the django migrations where doing all the migrations at once is not the same as doing migrations one by one. This has bitten me on multiple django projects.
- cuu508 8mo agoCan you give an example how this would happen?
- wiredfool 8mo agoOk, from memory -- There's a pre, do and post phase for the migrations. When you run a single migration, it's: pre, do, post. When you run 2 migrations, it's: pre [1,2], do: [1,2], post: [1,2]. So, if you have a migration that depends on a previous migration's post phase, then it will fail if it is run in a batch with the previous migration. When I've run into this is with data migrations, or if you're adding/assigining permissions to groups.
- brianwawok 8mo agoThere’s like an atomic flag you can pull it out of the transaction . Solves a lot of these issues.
- hansonkd 8mo agoDoes that affect the autogenerated migrations at all? Teh only time I ran into that issue as if I generated a table, created a data migration and then it failed because the table was created same transaction. Never had a problem with autogenerated migrations.
- advisedwang 8mo agoWhat a crazy design, why don't they just do pre1 do1 post1 pre2 do2 post2?
- Izkata 8mo agoThis doesn't sound at all familiar, are you sure you're not mixing it up with something else?