3 ms·
One way to think about this is to look at second-order indicators rather than direct “debt” metrics. For example: - Change failure rate or rollback frequency a
by cherry19870330 8mo ago
One way to think about this is to look at second-order indicators rather than direct “debt” metrics.
For example:
- Change failure rate or rollback frequency after AI-assisted changes
- Time-to-fix regressions introduced by generated code
- Ratio of generated code that later gets rewritten or deleted
- Increase in review time or comment volume per PR over time
These don’t directly label something as “AI-generated debt,” but they capture the maintenance and coordination costs that tend to show up later.
It’s imperfect, but it frames the discussion in measurable signals rather than subjective warnings.
- willj 8mo agoThanks! That makes sense. I suppose this requires commit messages or PRs to indicate code was AI-generated vs. not, or to assume that commits after a certain time period were all from AI coding. It’d be an interesting analysis. Maybe there’s already a study out there. In any case, thank you again!