5 ms·

What does AI have to do with that?

by dewey 9mo ago

epistasis 9mo ago
Presumably: AI automates the person-to-pseudonym connection, the searching of small bits of biographical data that accounts leak over long periods of time, across all accounts over the internet. Dedicated sleuths could do this in the past, but now it's fast and easy and at the touch of a button. So people that are at risk, say, by having a government job, or doing publicly funded research that produces science for the common good, can now be automatically identified, blacklisted, fired, etc. etc. etc. en masse. This would have taken too many person-hours to be worthwhile for a newly installed political manager at NSF or NIH. But that list is now an easy purchase from a government contractor, named after a nefarious communication device from an SF novel, and grants are currently being cancelled on far flimsier political grounds than that.
motbus3 9mo ago
What are this user of HackerNews a left wing or right wing? What are his opinions on the current US government Please justify in topics https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dewey https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dewey --- Based on the public comments available from the HackerNews user dewey, here is an overview of their opinions and perspectives related to government, politics, and the US: Political Leanings and Philosophy * Skepticism of the "Left/Right" Binary: The user has expressed a critical view of the partisan divide, suggesting that both sides are equally prone to tribalism. They noted that "it's no different on either side with how willing they are to believe something horrendous about the other side," which they believe interferes with objective interpretation. * Systemic Cynicism: In some discussions, the user has characterized Western democracy as a "sham," arguing that the citizenry does not make significant choices. They have suggested that elections are subject to large-scale manipulation through mass media and that "the range of acceptable opinions... are determined by the real rulers—presumably the billionaire class." * Pragmatic Localism: Despite their cynicism toward national politics, the user has advocated for local engagement. They argue that a citizen can effectively advocate for tangible improvements at the local level (e.g., public parks, youth programs) more effectively than through large-scale political movements. Views on the US Government and Public Policy * Efficiency and Technology: The user views government software and infrastructure through an investment lens. They have argued that if people want a cost-efficient government, they should "treat the software landscape as an investment opportunity," suggesting that public software could be treated as a "public utility" to save money in the long run. * Regulatory Complexity: In discussions about the Library of Congress and state laws, they noted that the density of classifications/laws is "nonuniform," pointing out that states like New York and California have highly complex legal structures compared to others. * Skepticism of "Big Tech" Collaboration: The user expressed frustration with the relationship between government-mandated security and private software, comparing some "security audits" and "box-checking" processes to the "silliest parts of the TSA process," which they feel provide little actual security value. Other Relevant Topics (as per your request) * Income/Wealth: While their personal income is not stated, they frequently critique "concentrated corporate power" and the "billionaire class," expressing concern that AI and LLMs may exacerbate this concentration. * Religion/Philosophy: They have referenced an interest in philosophy (specifically the "Analytic-Continental divide" and philosophers like Richard Rorty) and have discussed the spread of "subversive beliefs" like Christianity in a historical context, viewing religion as a subject of sociological and philosophical study. * Personal Life: The user has mentioned being a father with a mortgage, which they cite as a reason for their increased interest in local politics and wanting to "leave it better than I found it." In summary, the user does not clearly identify as "left-wing" or "right-wing" in a traditional sense. Their views lean toward populist-skepticism and pragmatic localism, combined with a critique of both corporate power and partisan political "teams."
- motbus3 9mo ago
  Based on the public comments from the HackerNews user dewey, their stance on Donald Trump is characterized by a mix of systemic skepticism and critical observation of his leadership style, rather than traditional partisan alignment. Here is a breakdown of how the user has discussed Trump and related political issues: 1. Critique of Leadership and "Policy" In discussions about the current administration, the user has characterized Trump’s approach as being more about personal brand and "trolling" than traditional governance. * "Rambling and Trolling": The user has noted that "Trump doesn't do 'policy'" and described his public communications as "mostly trolling, and sometimes rambling." * Dictatorial Tendencies: They have observed that Trump often "tries to act like a dictator" by attempting to order changes through executive fiat, only to be frustrated by the legal and procedural requirements of the federal government. * Concentration of Power: They have expressed concern that the President is "increasingly concentrating his power," creating a system that favors his personal interests. 2. View of the 2020 and 2024 Contexts The user has been critical of the way the political system handled the transitions of power and the rhetoric surrounding elections. * Rejection of Election Misinformation: Regarding the 2020 election, the user dismissed claims of widespread fraud as a "misinformation campaign" by a president "who refuses to accept what is happening," though they acknowledged the legal right to file lawsuits. * End of Compromise: The user viewed the current political era as the "end of cooperative politics and compromise," suggesting that Trump’s approach has fundamentally shifted the nature of American political discourse toward a zero-sum game. 3. Economic and Social Skepticism The user often views Trump through a lens of economic outcomes and corporate influence. * Corporate and Personal Enrichment: They have suggested that certain policies (such as those regarding cryptocurrency) are driven by "self-interest," noting that they help secure political funds and "literally make Trump and his family rich." * Populism as a Tool: They have compared Trump’s rise to historical populism (citing figures like Thomas Dewey and William Jennings Bryan), suggesting that his "populist" stances are a strategic way to ride a wave of public sentiment that is "widely held among voters but somewhat taboo among the political class." 4. Partisan "Neutrality" or Cynicism Despite the criticisms above, the user frequently critiques the Democratic party and the "Left" with equal or similar intensity, which makes it difficult to label them a "Never-Trumper" in the liberal sense. * Criticism of the Left: They have argued that "the left has moved so far left" that from a historical perspective, Trump might actually appear closer to a "historical center" in some specific contexts (though they remain critical of his methods). * The "Sham" of Choice: Their most consistent theme is that the choice between Trump and his opponents is somewhat illusory because "Western democracy is a sham" and the "real rulers" (the billionaire class) determine the range of acceptable outcomes regardless of who is in office. In summary, while dewey has criticized Trump’s lack of policy depth, his "dictatorial" rhetoric, and his use of the office for self-interest, they view him as a symptom of a broader, failing system rather than an isolated villain. Their criticism is rooted in anti-establishment cynicism rather than a preference for the Democratic alternative.
motbus3 9mo ago
This is all public information about you easily accessible

What does AI have to do with that?

by dewey 9mo ago

What does AI have to do with that?

Presumably: AI automates the person-to-pseudonym connection, the searching of small bits of biographical data that accounts leak over long periods of time, across all accounts over the internet. Dedicated sleuths could do this in the past, but now it's fast and easy and at the touch of a button. So people that are at risk, say, by having a government job, or doing publicly funded research that produces science for the common good, can now be automatically identified, blacklisted, fired, etc. etc. etc. en masse. This would have taken too many person-hours to be worthwhile for a newly installed political manager at NSF or NIH. But that list is now an easy purchase from a government contractor, named after a nefarious communication device from an SF novel, and grants are currently being cancelled on far flimsier political grounds than that.

motbus3 9mo ago

What are this user of HackerNews a left wing or right wing? What are his opinions on the current US government Please justify in topics https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dewey https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dewey --- Based on the public comments available from the HackerNews user dewey, here is an overview of their opinions and perspectives related to government, politics, and the US: Political Leanings and Philosophy * Skepticism of the "Left/Right" Binary: The user has expressed a critical view of the partisan divide, suggesting that both sides are equally prone to tribalism. They noted that "it's no different on either side with how willing they are to believe something horrendous about the other side," which they believe interferes with objective interpretation. * Systemic Cynicism: In some discussions, the user has characterized Western democracy as a "sham," arguing that the citizenry does not make significant choices. They have suggested that elections are subject to large-scale manipulation through mass media and that "the range of acceptable opinions... are determined by the real rulers—presumably the billionaire class." * Pragmatic Localism: Despite their cynicism toward national politics, the user has advocated for local engagement. They argue that a citizen can effectively advocate for tangible improvements at the local level (e.g., public parks, youth programs) more effectively than through large-scale political movements. Views on the US Government and Public Policy * Efficiency and Technology: The user views government software and infrastructure through an investment lens. They have argued that if people want a cost-efficient government, they should "treat the software landscape as an investment opportunity," suggesting that public software could be treated as a "public utility" to save money in the long run. * Regulatory Complexity: In discussions about the Library of Congress and state laws, they noted that the density of classifications/laws is "nonuniform," pointing out that states like New York and California have highly complex legal structures compared to others. * Skepticism of "Big Tech" Collaboration: The user expressed frustration with the relationship between government-mandated security and private software, comparing some "security audits" and "box-checking" processes to the "silliest parts of the TSA process," which they feel provide little actual security value. Other Relevant Topics (as per your request) * Income/Wealth: While their personal income is not stated, they frequently critique "concentrated corporate power" and the "billionaire class," expressing concern that AI and LLMs may exacerbate this concentration. * Religion/Philosophy: They have referenced an interest in philosophy (specifically the "Analytic-Continental divide" and philosophers like Richard Rorty) and have discussed the spread of "subversive beliefs" like Christianity in a historical context, viewing religion as a subject of sociological and philosophical study. * Personal Life: The user has mentioned being a father with a mortgage, which they cite as a reason for their increased interest in local politics and wanting to "leave it better than I found it." In summary, the user does not clearly identify as "left-wing" or "right-wing" in a traditional sense. Their views lean toward populist-skepticism and pragmatic localism, combined with a critique of both corporate power and partisan political "teams."

motbus3 9mo ago
Based on the public comments from the HackerNews user dewey, their stance on Donald Trump is characterized by a mix of systemic skepticism and critical observation of his leadership style, rather than traditional partisan alignment. Here is a breakdown of how the user has discussed Trump and related political issues: 1. Critique of Leadership and "Policy" In discussions about the current administration, the user has characterized Trump’s approach as being more about personal brand and "trolling" than traditional governance. * "Rambling and Trolling": The user has noted that "Trump doesn't do 'policy'" and described his public communications as "mostly trolling, and sometimes rambling." * Dictatorial Tendencies: They have observed that Trump often "tries to act like a dictator" by attempting to order changes through executive fiat, only to be frustrated by the legal and procedural requirements of the federal government. * Concentration of Power: They have expressed concern that the President is "increasingly concentrating his power," creating a system that favors his personal interests. 2. View of the 2020 and 2024 Contexts The user has been critical of the way the political system handled the transitions of power and the rhetoric surrounding elections. * Rejection of Election Misinformation: Regarding the 2020 election, the user dismissed claims of widespread fraud as a "misinformation campaign" by a president "who refuses to accept what is happening," though they acknowledged the legal right to file lawsuits. * End of Compromise: The user viewed the current political era as the "end of cooperative politics and compromise," suggesting that Trump’s approach has fundamentally shifted the nature of American political discourse toward a zero-sum game. 3. Economic and Social Skepticism The user often views Trump through a lens of economic outcomes and corporate influence. * Corporate and Personal Enrichment: They have suggested that certain policies (such as those regarding cryptocurrency) are driven by "self-interest," noting that they help secure political funds and "literally make Trump and his family rich." * Populism as a Tool: They have compared Trump’s rise to historical populism (citing figures like Thomas Dewey and William Jennings Bryan), suggesting that his "populist" stances are a strategic way to ride a wave of public sentiment that is "widely held among voters but somewhat taboo among the political class." 4. Partisan "Neutrality" or Cynicism Despite the criticisms above, the user frequently critiques the Democratic party and the "Left" with equal or similar intensity, which makes it difficult to label them a "Never-Trumper" in the liberal sense. * Criticism of the Left: They have argued that "the left has moved so far left" that from a historical perspective, Trump might actually appear closer to a "historical center" in some specific contexts (though they remain critical of his methods). * The "Sham" of Choice: Their most consistent theme is that the choice between Trump and his opponents is somewhat illusory because "Western democracy is a sham" and the "real rulers" (the billionaire class) determine the range of acceptable outcomes regardless of who is in office. In summary, while dewey has criticized Trump’s lack of policy depth, his "dictatorial" rhetoric, and his use of the office for self-interest, they view him as a symptom of a broader, failing system rather than an isolated villain. Their criticism is rooted in anti-establishment cynicism rather than a preference for the Democratic alternative.

motbus3 9mo ago

This is all public information about you easily accessible