4 ms·
Why does a person have to be "for" something?
by rationalist 9mo ago
Why does a person have to be "for" something?
- Psillisp 9mo ago[flagged]
- Volundr 9mo agoThe statement was made to point out that this is an example where a phone number is enough metadata to to problematic for privacy. It stands on its own. It doesn't need more context or purpose.
- rationalist 9mo ago"sleaze"?