4 ms·
Interesting that there would be people on a "side" that think there was a conspiracy to commit a crime. What crime?
by JKCalhoun 9mo ago
Interesting that there would be people on a "side" that think there was a conspiracy to commit a crime. What crime?
- PrettiGoodDead 9mo ago[flagged]
- mrtesthah 9mo agoWe already know that "doxxing" on its own is not a crime, and moreover that [non-undercover] federal agents are not entitled to keep their identities secret. We also know that legal observation and making noise does not constitute interference. So those may be their stated reasons, but they will not hold up in court.
- direwolf20 9mo agoInterference with a law enforcement investigation?
- mycodendral 9mo ago18 U.S.C. § 372 - Conspiring to impede or interfere with a federal officer
- baerrie 9mo agoThis refers to physical impediments. Spreading legal information is not an impediment, it is free speech. If all info could be interpreted as impediments to federal officers then phones, the internet, the human voice, etc would be illegal
- zahlman 9mo ago> This refers to physical impediments. Spreading legal information is not an impediment, it is free speech. Yes, but physical impediments are physical impediments. The protesters have been repeatedly seen to impede, or attempt to impede, ICE physically.
- baerrie 9mo agoNo, they are organizing legally, of course there will be bad actors, but blocking an agent out of bad faith is certainly less of a crime than a bad faith ICE agent killing someone for their assumptions
- mycodendral 9mo agoIn this case conspiracy is using communication to coordinate illegal impediment.
- baerrie 9mo agoCommunicating to protest in a legal way is a civil right
- rexpop 9mo agoIt's a crime. What do you have against crime? Nonviolent political action is often criminalized.
- mindslight 9mo agoIn the fascist's mind, anything that isn't supporting Dear Leader's vision of "greatness" is a crime.