What I said is that the world produces enough food for everyone (and then some), so 'over population' is not the reason for people not having enough resources.

What I said is that the world produces enough food for everyone (and then some), so 'over population' is not the reason for people not having enough resources. I was careful to point out that was all I was saying in several places. I added caveats to say that there are lots of hard problems around moving people to the resources. You chose to ignore all that, and argue against the point I explicitly didn't make. Congratulations on winning that argument. Your prize is a huge straw man.