3 ms·
US laws, hmm. Wasn't there something about an amendment to their constitution? I believe it might've even been the first? Something about freedom of speech? M
by saubeidl 9mo ago
US laws, hmm.
Wasn't there something about an amendment to their constitution? I believe it might've even been the first? Something about freedom of speech?
Maybe I'm just misremembering, but I could've sworn conservatives kept harping on about it.
- joe_mamba 9mo ago[flagged]
- 0x3f 9mo agoGenerally speaking, threats and calls to violence are legal. Only a subset are illegal.
- joe_mamba 9mo ago[flagged]
- 0x3f 9mo agoPossibly the police will come bother you, but you're not being convicted.
- SilverElfin 9mo agoYou should use Google and try to understand what the person you’re replying to is saying. Because they’re correct and there’s a nuance to it under the law.
- 0xy 9mo agoDid you have the same concerns when Biden's DoJ was colluding with social media to censor narratives they didn't like politically? https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/google-admits-censorship-under-biden-promises-end-bans-youtube-accounts https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/google-admi...
- filoeleven 9mo agoYou mean "politely asking social media to censor narratives, with the implied force of the federal government if they choose not to comply." Which every administration has done since social media became a thing.
- defrost 9mo agoThe Constitution is silent on the matter of the cutting room floor and Ellison lawnmowers. It only restricts the Federal government (later extended to state governments IIRC?) This is one of many reasons Federal government is now partnered with private business.