4 ms·
It's obvious. The harder you make it to down or hijack a plane, the fewer downed planes you will see. It didn't have to be perfect to prevent and deter. Some se
by 7e 8mo ago
It's obvious. The harder you make it to down or hijack a plane, the fewer downed planes you will see. It didn't have to be perfect to prevent and deter. Some security is better than no security. If you had no security at all you would see planes go down all the time.
And it wouldn't surprise me if some of the detection technology were classified.
It would not be "great" if governments were more open about their detection capabilities; that would cause more terrorism attempts and is one of the stupidest things one could do here.
- troupo 8mo ago> The harder you make it to down or hijack a plane, the fewer downed planes you will see. You know that TSA fails in 90-95% of cases and that crowds before it are a much jucier target?
- sejje 8mo agoHave those crowds been targeted? I see similar crowd densities all over the place. I can think of easier targets than the airport.
- troupo 8mo agoIndeed, those crowds haven't been targeted, and TSA fails to detect 90-95% of tests to bring anything dangerous on board. So what does that tell you?