4 ms·
> it stuck to its guns It gave you a probabilistic output. There were no guns and nothing to stick to. If you had disrupted the context with enough counterva
by themafia 9mo ago
> it stuck to its guns
It gave you a probabilistic output. There were no guns and nothing to stick to. If you had disrupted the context with enough countervailing opinion it would have "relented" simply because the conversational probabilities changed.
- nprateem 9mo agoIt's amazing this still needs to be said, especially here
- coffeefirst 9mo agoHere, sure. For the general public, these tools have been advertised this way. So if a good subset of HN still gets fooled, the layperson is screwed.
- gizajob 9mo agoHmm or the layperson wouldn’t be “smart” enough to think that ChatGPT could give useful answers to complex health questions.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- tstrimple 9mo agoI was amused but not impressed when I was able to convince Claude Code that it was useless and absolutely not a service worth paying for. It literally apologized and recommended I ask for a refund. I mean, I still get lots of value from CC. Just that it's easy to push them into whatever corner you want.