3 ms·
Deleting data according to a pre-defined schedule (often 90 days) is legitimate and standard. It's good that agencies do this, to limit exposure due to data bre
by tlb 9mo ago
Deleting data according to a pre-defined schedule (often 90 days) is legitimate and standard. It's good that agencies do this, to limit exposure due to data breaches. And it's normal for courts to issue a preservation order for specific data relevant to a potential case.
It'd be better if the courts could actually deal with the case now instead of in 1-5 years, but alas.
- Jtsummers 9mo ago> (often 90 days) Not for government agencies. Data retention generally goes much longer than that, usually measured in years or decades, not days or weeks.
- tlb 9mo agohttps://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/police-body-camera-policies-retention-and-release https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/poli... has a list of police body cam retention policies. 90 days is pretty common, though it ranges from 30 days to 5 years. Documents are kept longer. But a court needs to think about the shortest possible retention time that any agency might have for any kind of evidence.
- Jtsummers 9mo agoFrom your link's subheading: > This chart includes categories for how long video is kept if it does not contain evidence of a crime [emphasis added] So yes, some things are short (I did write "usually" for a reason), but even your link doesn't claim that video of a killing would be deleted in 90 days. It's evidence, 90 days would be ridiculously short for retaining evidence. Even for people who don't think the ICE agents committed a crime, the ICE agents and DHS have claimed that this was the outcome from actions by a "domestic terrorist" which certainly makes it evidence of a crime from their own perspective.