2 ms·
I think the opposite. It straightens incentives to cooperate. IIRC the UK has committed its nuclear weapons to defend NATO countries.
by graemep 9mo ago
I think the opposite. It straightens incentives to cooperate.
IIRC the UK has committed its nuclear weapons to defend NATO countries.
- ceejayoz 9mo ago> IIRC the UK has committed its nuclear weapons to defend NATO countries. So has the US, which is part of why this is so odd of an approach. Technically we’re required to nuke ourselves if we attack Greenland.
- direwolf20 9mo agoJust like the US committed to defend Ukraine?