> Just simple logic! It's simple "logic", for sure. > Instead you’re just openly declaring your own inability/unwillingness to assess information quality, and

> Just simple logic! It's simple "logic", for sure. > Instead you’re just openly declaring your own inability/unwillingness to assess information quality, and being proud of it? That's your interpretation, which is far from reality. I think the big difference here is you put way more value on polls than is warranted. It's not like you've provided a ton of sources, either. I likely won't be relying to you further, as I don't see the point. Cheers.