4 ms·
> It’s great yes, but if we in the US weren’t proving so untrustworthy, EU startups and tech giants could focus on building things that actually might out innov
by tdrz 9mo ago
> It’s great yes, but if we in the US weren’t proving so untrustworthy, EU startups and tech giants could focus on building things that actually might out innovate us and everyone else. Which would be a win-win.
Instead they will spend a lot time duplicating tools where only US companies are providing options, and maybe not innovating much if anything in those areas. Or not enough to matter much.
You could apply this to Slack vs Teams as well. Slack was already good, Microsoft just duplicated their work, came out with an inferior product and won. So, was it worth it?
- XorNot 9mo agoTeams won by being good enough and bundled into O365. There's probably some value in making a product so available that people can use it where normally they wouldn't have the opportunity.
- ornornor 9mo agoTeams won by being bundled with the rest of the Microsoft stack and shoved down captive (corporate) users throats.
- tanganik 9mo agoI was going to comment that teams doesn't have threads and slack may still win long term, but turns out teams added threads in the last couple of months(1). So yeah. 1: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoftteamsblog/from-threads-to-workflows-microsoft-teams-features-that-boost-everyone’s-product/4430879 https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoftteamsblog/...
- indoordin0saur 9mo agoI'll vouch for this. I moved from Slack to Teams and Teams is clearly an inferior product. That said, I don't think SalesForce owning Slack is really a big improvement.