4 ms·
Alter other people's property. Agreed, that is a dangerous concept
by readthenotes1 9mo ago
Alter other people's property.
Agreed, that is a dangerous concept
- direwolf20 9mo ago*in ways that don't harm that person
- bigstrat2003 9mo agoNonsense. The owner almost certainly doesn't want someone's "art" to adorn his wall, and will then have to pay to restore the wall to its desired condition. That is material harm done to the building owner.
- direwolf20 9mo agoYes, and if I don't like that someone left a fridge outside on the kerb for $20, I have to pay someone to remove the fridge. That doesn't mean my rights were infringed upon.
- readthenotes1 9mo agoThe kerb is your town's property, no? Why are you paying?
- browsingonly 9mo agoNot all harm is physical.
- direwolf20 9mo agoWhat is the harm?