4 ms·

Georgia leads push to ban datacenters used to power America's AI boom

56 points by toomuchtodo 10mo ago

direwolf20 10mo ago
It's federally illegal to regulate AI in any way
- bigbadfeline 10mo ago
  The aren't regulating AI but datacenters and energy. The fact that AI happens to depend on these is accidental.
- duskwuff 10mo ago
  According to what? A proposed moratorium on state AI regulation was overwhelmingly rejected back in July 2025: https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2025/7/senate-strikes-ai-moratorium-from-budget-reconciliation-bill-in-overwhelming-99-1-vote/8415a728-fd1d-4269-98ac-101d1d0c71e0 https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2025/7/senate-strikes-ai-mor...
  - TitaRusell 10mo ago
    [flagged]
- toomuchtodo 10mo ago
  The executive order you’re referring to has no power to override land use decisions of data center siting or moratoriums.
- estimator7292 10mo ago
  You do not kn any way understand how the American legal system works. Please visit your nearest elementary school for a refresher before voting.
dyauspitr 10mo ago
Why ban data centers. The push should be to build out more electricity generation capability.
- erxam 10mo ago
  Data centers are scarcely more than four walls, AC and a shit ton of equipment inside. By the time you finish building one power plant, 700 data centers have already popped up.
  - dyauspitr 10mo ago
    Okay then that’s the new normal. Build out more generation. Do what China is doing with literally 100% redundancy from the baseload. Data centers are also not decentralized like you’re saying, the vast majority of these are large facilities that take significant time and resources to build. Around 50 were built last year and between 80-100 are under construction right now, not 700 overnight. With about 6 GW consumption or about 24 GW of solar if you consider 25% operation time. The US installs about 30 GW of solar per year currently so you can offset that pretty easily with just one year of just solar power buildout. We need to step up our game- China is building out 300 GW of solar every year.
    - erxam 10mo ago
      700 was an exaggeration for dramatic effect, but 50 built in one year is still an astounding number. > Do what China is doing The massive build-up they have is mostly renewables. Surely, you see the problems with that, right? Georgia is a red state, so it's political suicide to even hint at proposing that. Don't even mention nuclear, Vogtle took three thousand years to get somewhere. There's also the very important question of what benefit it will bring to the people living (and voting) nearby. A datacenter isn't exactly a massive job centre. I very much doubt they pay any significant taxes. The utilities companies get a fat paycheck and that's about it.
      - philipkglass 10mo ago
westurner 10mo ago
Instead of banning datacenters, maybe: Must be Zero Water (you can fill up like a pool and then have normal water use) May have purple pipe water for community reuse Must be Zero Emissions Maximum decibels at property boundary Must be zoned datacenter/industrial Maximum kWh/acre, kWh/m^2 and/or bring your own energy with approval
jaynamburi 10mo ago
The Georgia proposal to pause new datacenters is a sign that infrastructure scaling is finally colliding with real-world constraints. These facilities aren’t just server racks they’re multi-GW industrial power consumers and massive water loads tied to HVAC/cooling systems. Right now a lot of the grid expansion to meet AI demand is being funded via utility models that socialize costs, so local ratepayers see higher bills while datacenters secure tax breaks and cheap power. A moratorium gives policymakers space to rethink energy procurement, interconnection queue reform, and cost allocation, instead of just letting hyperscale builds outpace grid planning. It’s not about banning compute per se it’s about aligning load growth with long-term capacity planning and environmental impact assessments. (For context on how local backlash has shaped policy elsewhere, see how Syaala/Science for Georgia have been tracking community energy use and resource concerns.)

56 points by toomuchtodo 10mo ago

direwolf20 10mo ago

It's federally illegal to regulate AI in any way

bigbadfeline 10mo ago
The aren't regulating AI but datacenters and energy. The fact that AI happens to depend on these is accidental.
duskwuff 10mo ago
According to what? A proposed moratorium on state AI regulation was overwhelmingly rejected back in July 2025: https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2025/7/senate-strikes-ai-moratorium-from-budget-reconciliation-bill-in-overwhelming-99-1-vote/8415a728-fd1d-4269-98ac-101d1d0c71e0 https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2025/7/senate-strikes-ai-mor...
- TitaRusell 10mo ago
  [flagged]
toomuchtodo 10mo ago
The executive order you’re referring to has no power to override land use decisions of data center siting or moratoriums.
estimator7292 10mo ago
You do not kn any way understand how the American legal system works. Please visit your nearest elementary school for a refresher before voting.

dyauspitr 10mo ago

Why ban data centers. The push should be to build out more electricity generation capability.

erxam 10mo ago
Data centers are scarcely more than four walls, AC and a shit ton of equipment inside. By the time you finish building one power plant, 700 data centers have already popped up.
- dyauspitr 10mo ago
  Okay then that’s the new normal. Build out more generation. Do what China is doing with literally 100% redundancy from the baseload. Data centers are also not decentralized like you’re saying, the vast majority of these are large facilities that take significant time and resources to build. Around 50 were built last year and between 80-100 are under construction right now, not 700 overnight. With about 6 GW consumption or about 24 GW of solar if you consider 25% operation time. The US installs about 30 GW of solar per year currently so you can offset that pretty easily with just one year of just solar power buildout. We need to step up our game- China is building out 300 GW of solar every year.
  - erxam 10mo ago
    700 was an exaggeration for dramatic effect, but 50 built in one year is still an astounding number. > Do what China is doing The massive build-up they have is mostly renewables. Surely, you see the problems with that, right? Georgia is a red state, so it's political suicide to even hint at proposing that. Don't even mention nuclear, Vogtle took three thousand years to get somewhere. There's also the very important question of what benefit it will bring to the people living (and voting) nearby. A datacenter isn't exactly a massive job centre. I very much doubt they pay any significant taxes. The utilities companies get a fat paycheck and that's about it.
    - philipkglass 10mo ago

westurner 10mo ago

Instead of banning datacenters, maybe: Must be Zero Water (you can fill up like a pool and then have normal water use) May have purple pipe water for community reuse Must be Zero Emissions Maximum decibels at property boundary Must be zoned datacenter/industrial Maximum kWh/acre, kWh/m^2 and/or bring your own energy with approval

jaynamburi 10mo ago

The Georgia proposal to pause new datacenters is a sign that infrastructure scaling is finally colliding with real-world constraints. These facilities aren’t just server racks they’re multi-GW industrial power consumers and massive water loads tied to HVAC/cooling systems. Right now a lot of the grid expansion to meet AI demand is being funded via utility models that socialize costs, so local ratepayers see higher bills while datacenters secure tax breaks and cheap power. A moratorium gives policymakers space to rethink energy procurement, interconnection queue reform, and cost allocation, instead of just letting hyperscale builds outpace grid planning. It’s not about banning compute per se it’s about aligning load growth with long-term capacity planning and environmental impact assessments. (For context on how local backlash has shaped policy elsewhere, see how Syaala/Science for Georgia have been tracking community energy use and resource concerns.)