4 ms·
OSS ChatGPT WebUI – 530 Models, MCP, Tools, Gemini RAG, Image/Audio Gen
- mdrzn 9mo agoPosted 5 times in the last 7 days, today it finally got 29 points with 0 comments? Weird.
- mythz 9mo agoMost announcements slip through without notice, it only picks up votes when it hits the main page. v1 also took a while to make it to HN, v3 is a complete rewrite focused on extensibility with a lot more new features.
- digiown 9mo agoThe few people looking at /new on HN are ridiculously overpowered. A few upvotes from them in the few hours will get you to the front page, and just 1-2 downvotes will make your post never see the light of day.
- freedomben 9mo agoYou can't downvote a post, so that's not a factor. Also it's not as powerful as you think. In the past I have spent a lot of time looking at /new, and upvoting stories that I think should be surfaced. The vast majority of them still never hit near the front page. It's a real shame, because some of the best and most relevant submissions don't seem to make it.
- oceansweep 9mo agoYou can absolutely downvote posts. You have to have a certain amount of karma before the option becomes available.
- digiown 9mo agoNo I was wrong. You can't downvote posts. Flags are used instead, apparently.
- freedomben 9mo agoYes, and I will fully agree with you that flags are overpowered. That system does need to be re-worked IMHO.
- nebezb 9mo agofreedomben has 28k karma. I don’t think the downvote button is coming.
- tuhgdetzhh 9mo agoIf you are in a company like e.g. ClickHouse and share a new HN Submission of ClickHouse via the internal Slack to #general, then you easily get enough upvotes for the front page.
- lukan 9mo agoWhat is stopping you from joining those "ridiculously overpowered people"?
- turblety 9mo agoThis looks great. I've been using OpenWebUI for a while now and the weird licence and inability to just pay for branding has frustrated me. This looks like it's not only a better license, but also much better features.
- mythz 9mo agoYep Open WebUI's switch to a non OSS license to inhibit competitive forks [1], in their own words [2] ensures I'll never use them. Happy to develop an OSS alternative that does the opposite whose rewrite on extensibility enables community extensions can replace built-in components and extensions so it can easily be rebranded and extended with custom UI + Server features. The goal is for the core main.py to be a single file without requiring additional dependencies, anything that does can be loaded as an extension (i.e. just a folder with .py server and UI hooks). There's also a script + docs so you can mix n' match the single main.py file and repackage it which whatever extensions you want included [3]. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/1kfhkal/open_webui_is_no_longer_open_source/ https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/1kfhkal/open_we... [2] https://docs.openwebui.com/license/ https://docs.openwebui.com/license/ [3] https://llmspy.org/docs/deployment/custom-build https://llmspy.org/docs/deployment/custom-build
- thedevilslawyer 9mo agoCan this be used in a multi user scenario?
- mythz 9mo agoYep, but it only supports GitHub OAuth. i.e. Content is either saved under no user (anonymous) or the authenticated GitHub User. https://llmspy.org/docs/deployment/github-oauth https://llmspy.org/docs/deployment/github-oauth
- thedevilslawyer 9mo agoThanks. Looks like this is purely to gatekeep internal access, but isn't ready for any oidc, or with a db backed session store. All the best for the project, will check in later on these..
- hobofan 9mo agoIf you are looking for a open source Chat WebUI with support for OIDC, maybe you are interested in the one we are building?[0] We are leveraging oauth2-proxy for the login here, so it should support all OIDC-compliant IDPs, and there are some guides by oauth2-proxy on how to configure for all the bigger providers. We do have customers using it with e.g. Azure, Keycloak, Google Directory. [0]: https://erato.chat https://erato.chat
- thedevilslawyer 9mo agoI see you have a dockerfile.combined - is this built and served via gh artifacts? I can try it out. Pros: Open source, and focus on lightweight. This is good. Cons: "customers" - Ugh, no offense, but smells of going down the same path as "open" webui, with the services expanding to fill enterprise use cases, and simplicity lost. LLMs.py seems to be focussing purely on simplicity + OK with rewriting for it. this + 3bsd is solid ethos. Will await their story on multi-user, hosted app. They have most of the things sorted anyway, including RAG, extensions, etc.
- storystarling 9mo agoHow are you handling the orchestration for the Computer Use agent? Is that running on LangGraph or did you roll a custom state machine? I've found managing state consistency in long-running agent loops to be the hardest part to get right reliably.
- mythz 9mo agoNo custom state machine or agent, it's only a copy of Anthropic's 3 computer use tools: run_bash, edit, computer. https://github.com/ServiceStack/llms/tree/main/llms/extensions/computer https://github.com/ServiceStack/llms/tree/main/llms/extensio... It's run in the same process, there's no long agent loops, everything's encapsulated within a single message thread.
- chicagobuss 9mo agowhy not just use llm by simon willison
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- cyanydeez 9mo agoWhat is ChatGPT used in the title when it's clearly a much more flexible ui?
- mythz 9mo agoCouldn't think of a better title, do you have any suggestions?
- tiahura 9mo agoDo people really use claude code or any other agent with a paid api key? Why? Why wouldn't you just get Claude Max?
- mythz 9mo agoI wouldn't use Claude API Key pricing, but I also wouldn't get a Claude Max sub unless it was the only AI tool I used. Antigravity / Google AI Pro is much better value, been using it as my primary IDE assistant for a couple months and have yet to hit a quota limit on my $16/mo sub (annual pricing) which also includes a tonne of other AI perks inc. Nano Banana, TTS, NotebookLM, storage, etc. No need to use Anthropic's premium models for tool calling when Gemini/MiniMax are better value models that still perform well. I still have a Claude Pro plan, but I use it much less than Antigravity and thanks to Anthropic axing their sub usage, I no longer use it outside of CC.
- esperent 9mo agoCounterpoint: on the $20 monthly account I would hit my 5 hour limits within an hour on antigravity. I end up spending half my time managing my context and keeping conversations short.
- adam_patarino 9mo agoYeah, I’ve hit this too. Once you do real agentic work or TDD, you’re optimizing context instead of code. That frustration is why we built Cortex: flat cost, no turn limits, runs locally, and git-aware context so you can just keep going. cortex.build
- tgtweak 9mo agoRate limits mostly - plus claude code is a relatively recent thing but sonnet api has been around for a while with 3rd party apps (like cline). In those scenarios, it was only api.
- augusteo 9mo agoCurious about the MCP integration. Are people using this for production workloads or mostly experimentation?
- mythz 9mo agoMCP support is available via the fast_mcp extension: https://llmspy.org/docs/mcp/fast_mcp https://llmspy.org/docs/mcp/fast_mcp I use llms .py as a personal assistant and MCP is required to access tools available via MCP. MCP is a great way to make features available to AI assistants, here's a couple I've created after enabling MCP support: - https://llmspy.org/docs/mcp/gemini_gen_mcp https://llmspy.org/docs/mcp/gemini_gen_mcp - Give AI Agents ability to generate Nano Banana Images or generate TTS audio - https://llmspy.org/docs/mcp/omarchy_mcp https://llmspy.org/docs/mcp/omarchy_mcp - Manage Omarchy Desktop Themes with natural language I will say there's a noticable delay in using MCP vs tools, where I ended up porting Anthropic's node filesystem MCP to Python [1] to speed up common AI Assistant tasks, so their not ideal for frequent access of small tasks, but are great for long running tasks like Image/Audio generation. [1] https://github.com/ServiceStack/llms/blob/main/llms/extensions/computer/filesystem.py https://github.com/ServiceStack/llms/blob/main/llms/extensio...
- storystarling 9mo agoDoes the MCP implementation make it easy to swap out the underlying image provider? I've found Gemini is still a bit hit or miss for actual print-on-demand products compared to Midjourney. Since MJ still doesn't have a real API I've been routing requests to Flux via Replicate for higher quality automated flows. Curious if I could plug that in here without too much friction.
- mythz 9mo agoMCP allows AI Models that doesn't support Image generation the ability to generate images/audio via tool calling. But you can just select the Image Generation model you prefer to use directly [1]. Currently supports Google, Open AI, OpenRouter, Chutes, Z.ai and Nvidia. I tried Replicate's MCP, but it looks like everything but generate images which I didn't understand, surely image generation would be its most sought after feature? [1] https://llmspy.org/docs/v3#image-generation-support https://llmspy.org/docs/v3#image-generation-support