3 ms·
It is illegal. It gives the population the idea they have the right to alter their environment, and that's dangerous.
by direwolf20 10mo ago
It is illegal. It gives the population the idea they have the right to alter their environment, and that's dangerous.
- readthenotes1 10mo agoAlter other people's property. Agreed, that is a dangerous concept
- direwolf20 10mo ago*in ways that don't harm that person
- bigstrat2003 10mo agoNonsense. The owner almost certainly doesn't want someone's "art" to adorn his wall, and will then have to pay to restore the wall to its desired condition. That is material harm done to the building owner.
- direwolf20 9mo agoYes, and if I don't like that someone left a fridge outside on the kerb for $20, I have to pay someone to remove the fridge. That doesn't mean my rights were infringed upon.
- readthenotes1 9mo agoThe kerb is your town's property, no? Why are you paying?
- browsingonly 10mo agoNot all harm is physical.
- direwolf20 9mo agoWhat is the harm?