3 ms·

There are other sources, like this: https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-killed-in-iran-say-senior-officials/ https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-kille

There are other sources, like this: https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-killed-in-iran-say-senior-officials/ https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-killed-in-iran-say-...

readitalready 8mo ago
[dead]
vogre 8mo ago
Which also refer to unnamed sources and "U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency"(read CIA)
- squidbeak 8mo ago
  Why lie about this when the first paragraph is explicit about its source? > As many as 30,000 people could have been killed in the streets of Iran on Jan. 8 and 9 alone, two senior officials of the country’s Ministry of Health told TIME
  - vogre 8mo ago
    >two senior officials of the country’s Ministry of Health And their names are never called.
    - johanyc 8mo ago
      It's pretty common practice if naming them will get the people who shared the info in trouble. Depends on whether you think Time is a trustworthy source I guess
      - vogre 8mo ago
        Time always was a propaganda leaflet. Remember "bomb serbs to heel" or "sinister world of saddam"
  - pydry 8mo ago
    The US paid for similar information from Iraq about WMDs just before it kicked off the invasion. Meanwhile, the US is rearranging its forces in the middle east. What a coincidence.