> No one considers eugenics science. No one considers eugenics science NOW, but it was considered science back then and we're commenting on modern scientific s

> No one considers eugenics science. No one considers eugenics science NOW, but it was considered science back then and we're commenting on modern scientific studies that would be adopted wholesale by the eugenics scientists of the time. It doesn't matter what you call it, if it walks like eugenics, if talks like eugenics it is eugenics even if that word was thrown out as politically inconvenient. Go back to my first comment in this thread and understand it in this light. > Just because some guy in the 1800s said it was science doesn't make it so. It continued well into 1900's up until WW2 and it was a social theory as scientific as any other at the time, otherwise it would not be used for justification of government policies.