3 ms·
The person in question in the article is kirkegaard, you should not take seriously what he does anyway https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Diversity_Foundation
by amarcheschi 9mo ago
The person in question in the article is kirkegaard, you should not take seriously what he does anyway
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Diversity_Foundation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Diversity_Foundation
edit since i was feeling really daring today i found an old archived page of a wiki holding a lot of interesting thoughts from him, such as eugenics to prevent the loss of western civilization, and other points that at this point you should imagine. link: https://web.archive.org/web/20250416005529/https:/rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard https://web.archive.org/web/20250416005529/https:/rationalwi...
- inshard 9mo agoInteresting comparing these two entries: https://grokipedia.com/page/OpenPsych https://grokipedia.com/page/OpenPsych https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPsych https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPsych
- amarcheschi 9mo agothe entire microuniverse of some rationalist/pseudoscience groups feeling really "rational" and then having racist, sexist, (insert -ist or -ism here) views is a bit of a joke at this point
- terminalshort 9mo agoThis criticism seems to mostly be that he is associated with bad people who say naughty things. Maybe he is a bad scientist, but where are all the well designed scientific studies that show his conclusions are wrong? That's what I care about, but they don't exist because you would never get funding and even to propose running such a study would be career suicide.