This is so short and empty sorry, the author would be well placed to try to ground their work in a modicum of empiricism, the puffed-up style here makes things

This is so short and empty sorry, the author would be well placed to try to ground their work in a modicum of empiricism, the puffed-up style here makes things a bit hard to read. I do not know if this is slop it's getting harder to guess, and some actual humans have been writing like this long before LLMs. Still, what is the actual finding being presented here?