3 ms·
> notice is that there's always been oscillations There's always been oscilations, true, but the rate o change and trend on those oscilations is the real issue
by raducu 9mo ago
> notice is that there's always been oscillations
There's always been oscilations, true, but the rate o change and trend on those oscilations is the real issue.
- luckys 9mo agoHappy to be shown where I can learn more about this different rate of change and trend which sets our current climate change apart from the rest of Earth's history.
- sagacity 9mo agoIt seems like you won't have any trouble finding that yourself if you really wanted to. This "I'm just asking questions" mode you're in can be considered a type of trolling called "sealioning". More details here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
- luckys 9mo agoMore bad faith interpretations. Here is at least something tangible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surface_temperature#Global_temperature_record https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surface_temperature#Glo... On this page can be found the following graphic https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/EPICA_temperature_plot.svg/960px-EPICA_temperature_plot.svg.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/EP... On that graphic -- under the heading 'Ice cores (from 800,000 years before present)' in case the link gets truncated -- one can observe regular peaks in temperature that took place before the current one. I'm happy to be explained what caused them, as it could not have been human industrial activity. That's it. I'm open to dialogue but won't entertain any more lazy dismissals and unfair characterization.
- rcxdude 9mo agoAlmost anywhere where the measurements behind climate science is being discussed. Just pay attention to the x axis on the plots.