4 ms·
The Jaguar hack cost the UK $2.5Bn and dropped production to levels you'd normally only see during open warfare. Recovery took many months, and the financial da
by csomar 9mo ago
The Jaguar hack cost the UK $2.5Bn and dropped production to levels you'd normally only see during open warfare. Recovery took many months, and the financial damage persists today.
We still operate with a primitive homunculi where a gunshot is considered aggressive, but sabotaging infrastructure that can kill hundreds from cold is being waved at.
- ifwinterco 9mo agoBut hey, at least they saved a few million a year in developer salaries by offshoring
- cyanydeez 9mo agoThe difference is the bureaucratic "doubt" about who did what. Which, with the current zeit geist, should really be minimized to almost zero
- bethekidyouwant 9mo agoBlame everything on X group i don’t like is a bold move
- cyanydeez 9mo agoWe have two clear videos of federal USA employees executing citizens. What stopa the execution of legal system? The claim that we cant know 100% of the facts. In reality, theres little to dispute with the facts. Theres simply groups of true believers and those who think we need more clarity. Those two forces alloq the continuation of violations
- bethekidyouwant 9mo agoI thought you were talking about Russian hacking
- cyanydeez 9mo agoI am. Why arn't we doing more against "Russian" hacking, because: 1. They outsource it 2. It rarely has clear red flags, eg "Putin's IP showed up on our PC before the virus" So, I'm generalizing the argument about why direct action rarely occurs: It's because even if theres a great deal of evidence, the fuzzy logic required to say "this is statistically true" is rarely used.