3 ms·
> They disarmed him and then they shot him. So you're saying you can show me a video where it's clear that the gun is in an LEO's physical possession, everyone
by zahlman 10mo ago
> They disarmed him and then they shot him.
So you're saying you can show me a video where it's clear that the gun is in an LEO's physical possession, everyone involved clearly has time to update on this information, and someone makes an evidently conscious decision to shoot him anyway, despite him clearly no longer posing a physical threat?
Really?
Because otherwise, it is not about punishment.
- bradgranath 10mo agoReally. That is exactly what happened.
- arathis 10mo agoIt’s murder. They murdered him mate.
- filoeleven 10mo agohttps://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qlvpbr/footage_of_the_grey_coat_officer_retrieving_the/ https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qlvpbr/footage_of_the...
- mvdtnz 10mo agoIt couldn't be any clearer, that is the weapon from the photos of the victim's gun. This changed my mind, the man was shot AFTER he was disarmed.
- tastyface 10mo agoBellingcat: https://bsky.app/profile/bellingcat.com/post/3md7banbjks2x https://bsky.app/profile/bellingcat.com/post/3md7banbjks2x These investigators are not amateurs, and that’s putting it lightly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellingcat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellingcat
- int_19h 10mo agoThese are not the people who deserve benefit of the doubt. They have already amply demonstrated what they are capable of. Indeed, they even openly boast of it.
- wqaatwt 10mo ago> conscious Depends on how you define the word. But yes? Their decision to escalate the situation in the first place is a clear indication of that. > no longer posing a physical threat? Can you show a video of the gun leaving its holster before that then? Or are you saying that merely possessing a firearm regardless of circumstances is grounds for an immediate execution?
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]