4 ms·

Even if they guy had a gun, it's left to see what actually transpired here. Whether the guy owned the gun, had firearm permit and even if he had a public and/or

Even if they guy had a gun, it's left to see what actually transpired here. Whether the guy owned the gun, had firearm permit and even if he had a public and/or concealed gun permit.

dragontamer 9mo ago
That's already been revealed by Minnesota Police (thank goodness we at least have some degree of independent investigations going on right now). 1. Only had parking tickets on his criminal record. No other criminal activity. 2. Owned a gun with firearms permit. 3. 36 Years Old, male. EDIT: I misremembered. Its apparently 37 year old male. Minnesota Police only have jurisdiction inside of Minnesota however. So those four+ ICE shooters just need to leave the state and they're safe. The FBI is required to pursue across state lines.
- mothballed 9mo ago
  [flagged]
  - edaemon 9mo ago
    He was a US citizen according to the Minneapolis police chief.
  - dragontamer 9mo ago
    US Citizen with gun permit. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara had a press briefing a few hours ago.
    - deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]
  - CamperBob2 9mo ago
    He was an ICE observer, not a target. He was legally carrying a gun, but the object he was "brandishing" was a phone.
  - cogman10 9mo ago
    A citizen, A vet, and a nurse at the VA. None of that should really matter here. He didn't have his gun when he was shot the first time. He wasn't moving after the first shot and the 5 shots later were completely unnecessary and dangerous to the general public. This sort of hair splitting is gross. Even if he illegally possessed the gun, the execution wasn't justified. He was not brandishing and nobody was in danger because of his possession of the gun.
    - mothballed 9mo ago
      [flagged]
      - lovich 9mo ago
        Based on the history of interactions I’ve had with you, you didn’t have your interest piqued, you were looking for a reason that it could be blamed on the victim for information that the shooter had no way of knowing prior to pulling the trigger. Don’t “apparently” this crowd when you are obviously JAQing off.
        mothballed 9mo ago
        So you made a bad assumption. I'm pretty sure you're the same guy I told I'm for completely open borders, but somehow you got it in your head I'm trying to make excuses for ICE. I'm also of the opinion that the second amendment also applies to illegal immigrants, though the courts generally don't agree with this. But you decided I said some things you consider "right wing" earlier so I must agree with whatever Trump's Gestapo is doing. The truth is, I couldn't even wrap my head around why they were even arresting the guy, because I couldn't understand why they were going after someone with a permit, which usually requires legal status. My interest relates to the fact that if the federal courts in his jurisdiction didn't agree out of status had 2A rights, and he had a valid permit and legally owned a gun, it should establish he shouldn't be of interest to ICE.
        lovich 9mo ago

Even if they guy had a gun, it's left to see what actually transpired here. Whether the guy owned the gun, had firearm permit and even if he had a public and/or concealed gun permit.

dragontamer 9mo ago

That's already been revealed by Minnesota Police (thank goodness we at least have some degree of independent investigations going on right now). 1. Only had parking tickets on his criminal record. No other criminal activity. 2. Owned a gun with firearms permit. 3. 36 Years Old, male. EDIT: I misremembered. Its apparently 37 year old male. Minnesota Police only have jurisdiction inside of Minnesota however. So those four+ ICE shooters just need to leave the state and they're safe. The FBI is required to pursue across state lines.

mothballed 9mo ago
[flagged]
- edaemon 9mo ago
  He was a US citizen according to the Minneapolis police chief.
- dragontamer 9mo ago
  US Citizen with gun permit. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara had a press briefing a few hours ago.
  - deleted 9mo ago
    [deleted]
- CamperBob2 9mo ago
  He was an ICE observer, not a target. He was legally carrying a gun, but the object he was "brandishing" was a phone.
- cogman10 9mo ago
  A citizen, A vet, and a nurse at the VA. None of that should really matter here. He didn't have his gun when he was shot the first time. He wasn't moving after the first shot and the 5 shots later were completely unnecessary and dangerous to the general public. This sort of hair splitting is gross. Even if he illegally possessed the gun, the execution wasn't justified. He was not brandishing and nobody was in danger because of his possession of the gun.
  - mothballed 9mo ago
    [flagged]
    - lovich 9mo ago
      Based on the history of interactions I’ve had with you, you didn’t have your interest piqued, you were looking for a reason that it could be blamed on the victim for information that the shooter had no way of knowing prior to pulling the trigger. Don’t “apparently” this crowd when you are obviously JAQing off.
      - mothballed 9mo ago
        So you made a bad assumption. I'm pretty sure you're the same guy I told I'm for completely open borders, but somehow you got it in your head I'm trying to make excuses for ICE. I'm also of the opinion that the second amendment also applies to illegal immigrants, though the courts generally don't agree with this. But you decided I said some things you consider "right wing" earlier so I must agree with whatever Trump's Gestapo is doing. The truth is, I couldn't even wrap my head around why they were even arresting the guy, because I couldn't understand why they were going after someone with a permit, which usually requires legal status. My interest relates to the fact that if the federal courts in his jurisdiction didn't agree out of status had 2A rights, and he had a valid permit and legally owned a gun, it should establish he shouldn't be of interest to ICE.
        lovich 9mo ago