4 ms·
Interesting. Though of course you can just use my http://createjs.org/ http://createjs.org/ and get pretty much the same thing for free :-)
by bergie 14y ago
Interesting. Though of course you can just use my http://createjs.org/ http://createjs.org/ and get pretty much the same thing for free :-)
- railsjedi 14y agoCreateJS is awesome. This service seems to be more about content hosting though. So still useful to some people I think.
- bergie 14y agoTrue, though usually people would seem rather want to have their content on their own servers, and have an API the editing tool uses to save. This is the scenario Create.js was built for, allowing you to use it in a custom web app, but also major CMSs like TYPO3 or OpenCms to build their custom UIs on top of it.
- clone1018 14y agoYour site fails to load almost completely past the homepage, when I try to use your demo I get quite of a bit of resources 504ing.
- callmevlad 14y agoPretty sure it's getting overloaded with traffic, because it wasn't like that a few hours ago.
- bergie 14y agoGitHub Pages had DoS today https://status.github.com/ https://status.github.com/
- navs 14y agoLove it! Now a quick question, is there any way to allow for editable blocks to be re-arranged via some form of drag and drop interface? Or is there anyone out there that knows of a library that could possibly do this?
- bergie 14y agoNot yet integrated upstream, but you can see block drag-and-drop in action with Create in http://demo.contentcontrol-berlin.de/ http://demo.contentcontrol-berlin.de/
- navs 14y agoA bit buggy right now on Mac OSX Chrome 22 but I see what you're doing. Can't wait to see the final implementation. Awesome work.