> It's not the cost of protecting one transaction from another transaction I know it’s not and never suggested it was. I was making the point that writes cont

> It's not the cost of protecting one transaction from another transaction I know it’s not and never suggested it was. I was making the point that writes contain more overhead than reads (which should be obvious) so people should bear that in mind when reading this blog post. Edit: is it “bear” or “bare”? I’m never sure with that phrase haha