3 ms·
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional) is requirements of XHTML club, thus my comparison with HTML 4.01
by reconnecting 9mo ago
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional) is requirements of XHTML club, thus my comparison with HTML 4.01
- jraph 9mo ago> Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional) is requirements of XHTML club Where do you see this? I see that they do use XHTML 1.0 Strict but I don't see this requirement written. Brad, we need your clarification here, it's critical, we need you to tell us which one of us is wrong! :-)
- reconnecting 9mo agoThank you for asking. XHTML Members(1): Current websites that are valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional) Back to tirreno website, it is a pure transitional HTML 4.01 without JS or CSS, thus more or less same challenges to make it W3 valid (2) in our days. Have a look. 1. https://xhtml.club/members.html https://xhtml.club/members.html 2. https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https://www.tirreno.com/&ss=1&group=1 https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https://www.tirreno.com/&...
- jraph 9mo agoDamn, it seems you are right! Still not convinced with your proposal to extend the XHTML club to include valid HTML 4.01, not that I care much anyway :-)