3 ms·

> serious threat Regardless, neither that agent's actions nor his decision-making were serious when he murdered Renee Good. > But they are allowed [to murder

• zahlman 9mo ago
  >> serious threat > Regardless, neither that agent's actions nor his decision-making were serious This is a strange, non-sequitur word game. > They're also "allowed" to get out the damn way. I previously submitted a legal analysis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDda-L_ZOE8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDda-L_ZOE8). Please indicate where you disagree with what is said in the video. The short version is that what the officer could have done, with the benefit of hindsight, is not legally relevant. Note that I have not insulted you at any point, nor alleged bad faith on your part, so I think this is a more reasonable request than the one that was made of me in the other thread. > But they are allowed [to murder because they feel like it] No, my entire point is that this is objectively not covered by the definition of the word "murder", and that it was clearly not done "because the officer felt like it". > Interesting how the violent solution seems preferred, though. One might even mistake a "law enforcement officer" for a "gang member". This sort of rhetoric is not conducive to discussion.