2 ms·
The 2% was made up for demonstration purposes, I'm not really sure how it plays out in the real world. It is a good question. Though consider this: $70K + 5%
by randomdata 14y ago
The 2% was made up for demonstration purposes, I'm not really sure how it plays out in the real world. It is a good question. Though consider this:
$70K + 5% [1]
$50K living + 3%
-----------
$2.5M saved after 30 years [2]
$70K for life
$20K living + 3%
-----------
$2.7M saved after 30 years
Even a decent rate may not be all it is cracked up to be.
[1] For the first 15 years, whereafter you suggest it could plateau (at around $140K, in this case, which doesn't seem unreasonable given the current market and historic income increases)
[2] Assumes all non-living expense allocated income is invested at 5%.