3 ms·

Can't really fault them when this exists: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code

by stavros 10mo ago

bad_haircut72 10mo ago
What even is this repo? Its very deceptive
- adastra22 10mo ago
  Issue tracker for submitting bug reports that no one ever reads or responds to.
  - stavros 10mo ago
    Now that's not fair, I'm sure they have Claude go through and ignore the reports.
    - adastra22 10mo ago
      Unironically yes. If you file a bug report, expect a Claude bot to mark it as duplicate of other issues already reported and close. Upon investigation you will find either (1) a circular chain of duplicate reports, all closed: or (2) a game of telephone where each issue is subtly different from the next, eventually reaching an issue that has nothing at all to do with yours. At no point along the way will you encounter an actual human from Anthropic.
kylequest 10mo ago
By the way, I reversed engineered the Claude Code binary and started sharing different code snippets (on twitter/bluesky/mastadon/threads). There's a lot of code there, so I'm looking for requests in terms of what part of the code to share and analyze what it's doing. One of the requests I got was about the LSP functionality in CC. Anything else you would find interesting to explore there? I'll post the whole thing in a Github repo too at some point, but it's taking a while to prettify the code, so it looks more natural :-)
- lifthrasiir 10mo ago
  Not only this would violate the ToS, but also a newer native version of Claude Code precompiles most JS source files into the JavaScriptCore's internal bytecode format, so reverse engineering would soon become much more annoying if not harder.
  - kylequest 10mo ago
    Also some WASM there too... though WASM is mostly limited to Tree Sitter for language parsing. Not touching those in phase 1 :-)
  - arianvanp 10mo ago
    Claude code is very good at reverse engineering. I reverse engineer Apple products in my MacBook all the time to debug issues
  - embedding-shape 10mo ago
    > Not only this would violate the ToS What specific parts of the ToS does "sharing different code snippets" violate? Not that I don't believe you, just curious about the specifics as it seems like you've already dug through it.
pxc 10mo ago
Using GitHub as an issue tracker for proprietary software should be prohibited. Not that it would, these days. Codeberg at least has some integrity around such things.
majkinetor 10mo ago
That must be the worst repo I have ever seen.

Can't really fault them when this exists: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code

by stavros 10mo ago

Can't really fault them when this exists: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code

bad_haircut72 10mo ago

What even is this repo? Its very deceptive

adastra22 10mo ago
Issue tracker for submitting bug reports that no one ever reads or responds to.
- stavros 10mo ago
  Now that's not fair, I'm sure they have Claude go through and ignore the reports.
  - adastra22 10mo ago
    Unironically yes. If you file a bug report, expect a Claude bot to mark it as duplicate of other issues already reported and close. Upon investigation you will find either (1) a circular chain of duplicate reports, all closed: or (2) a game of telephone where each issue is subtly different from the next, eventually reaching an issue that has nothing at all to do with yours. At no point along the way will you encounter an actual human from Anthropic.

kylequest 10mo ago

By the way, I reversed engineered the Claude Code binary and started sharing different code snippets (on twitter/bluesky/mastadon/threads). There's a lot of code there, so I'm looking for requests in terms of what part of the code to share and analyze what it's doing. One of the requests I got was about the LSP functionality in CC. Anything else you would find interesting to explore there? I'll post the whole thing in a Github repo too at some point, but it's taking a while to prettify the code, so it looks more natural :-)

lifthrasiir 10mo ago
Not only this would violate the ToS, but also a newer native version of Claude Code precompiles most JS source files into the JavaScriptCore's internal bytecode format, so reverse engineering would soon become much more annoying if not harder.
- kylequest 10mo ago
  Also some WASM there too... though WASM is mostly limited to Tree Sitter for language parsing. Not touching those in phase 1 :-)
- arianvanp 10mo ago
  Claude code is very good at reverse engineering. I reverse engineer Apple products in my MacBook all the time to debug issues
- embedding-shape 10mo ago
  > Not only this would violate the ToS What specific parts of the ToS does "sharing different code snippets" violate? Not that I don't believe you, just curious about the specifics as it seems like you've already dug through it.

pxc 10mo ago

Using GitHub as an issue tracker for proprietary software should be prohibited. Not that it would, these days. Codeberg at least has some integrity around such things.

majkinetor 10mo ago

That must be the worst repo I have ever seen.