2 ms·
>I think that a blatantly bad faith partisan investigation Sounds like you agree with me, because you're still not objecting to my original premise of "we shou
by gruez 10mo ago
>I think that a blatantly bad faith partisan investigation
Sounds like you agree with me, because you're still not objecting to my original premise of "we shouldn't be trying imply that intending to overturn elections in cases of fraud is bad in and of itself". You might think "bad faith partisan investigation" is bad, but not the act of trying to overturn elections itself.
- tshaddox 10mo agoYou explicitly applied it to this investigation, saying the investigation itself was not bad. If you intend to weaken your claim to "not all conceivable investigations of election fraud are bad," then yes, I agree, but that's such an extraneous comment that I would question the intent of including it.
- gruez 10mo ago>You explicitly applied it to this investigation, saying the investigation itself was not bad. I'm not sure how you reached that conclusion given what I wrote was: >we shouldn't be trying imply that intending to overturn elections in cases of fraud is bad in and of itself