3 ms·
Had you bothered to read the actual research paper, you would have seen that your description is not appropriate for it. The experimental results described in
by adrian_b 10mo ago
Had you bothered to read the actual research paper, you would have seen that your description is not appropriate for it.
The experimental results described in detail in the paper are credible enough.
Obviously anyone who is competent enough can fabricate a plausible fake description of any experiments, so no research paper reporting novel experimental results can be trusted until someone else succeeds to reproduce the claimed results.
While such results cannot be trusted until independent confirmation, they also cannot be dismissed as fantasies of dilettantes, without serious evidence for this.
- eigenspace 10mo agoThe paper concludes that this is a superconductor merely by doing a resistivity measurement, and then applying a magnetic field to see if the resistivity increases. This is not a sufficient nor convincing measurment to demonstrate superconductivity. I mean, maybe this is a real superconductor, but they havent demonstrated convincing evidence of it, and their peer researchers hold similarly low standards, so they will likely not be held to account.