3 ms·
Instead you worry about Microsoft axing it? Sure, it might take 3 years instead of 6 months, and the shutdown period would be 1 year instead of 1 month, but har
by embedding-shape 10mo ago
Instead you worry about Microsoft axing it? Sure, it might take 3 years instead of 6 months, and the shutdown period would be 1 year instead of 1 month, but hardly either are long-term solutions.
- aylmao 10mo ago> it might take 3 years instead of 6 months, and the shutdown period would be 1 year instead of 1 month This matters much more than people (and evidently those within Google) realize
- embedding-shape 10mo agoIt matters more the shorter your future planning is. Neither works if you're looking forward 3-4 years, for example.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- aylmao 10mo agoWhy wouldn’t it work if you plan ahead 3-4 years? Planning ahead doesn’t mean you never suffer from unexpected events, including depreciations. And long timelines help you as much as anyone else.
- sumtechguy 10mo agoHaving been downsizing my horde of computer junk I have several large boxes of full MSDN disc sets. There is a graveyard of MS stuff that is no longer supported. The only thing with MS is they seem to give you a better off ramp usually than 'oh well sucks to be you'.