I think the point was that the quality of both meat and hosting products varies greatly but is not easily understood by consumers. When consumers don't understa

I think the point was that the quality of both meat and hosting products varies greatly but is not easily understood by consumers. When consumers don't understand what makes something good, you're left with no choice but to compete on price, driving quality down even further. In the end you could get a market where most offerings suck, very little people are aware of it, and almost everyone is worse off. I do however agree that the article provided very little insight.