5 ms·

+1 for taking the time to explain (without too much snark, like the other comrade). However I merely pointed out that this whole thing is wildly OTT by quoting

by Surio 14y ago

+1 for taking the time to explain (without too much snark, like the other comrade). However I merely pointed out that this whole thing is wildly OTT by quoting an old meme. Other than this what else can someone add in matter like these? It would be presumptuous (in my World view at least) to mouth opinions on how the World ought to be run when it is very clear to me that most of these things are like random chance set into motion where things become apparent only in hindsight. One example of this is the Joshua Bell experiment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Bell#Washington_Post_experiment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Bell#Washington_Post_exp... Thanks again for pointing this.

mmcnickle 14y ago
I don't comment much on topics where I feel I lack enough knowledge to add anything to the conversation, even if I find the post or conversation interesting. As a result, I only really comment on perhaps < 2-3% of the threads I read. I imagine this is similar to a lot of other HNers and it helps keep the signal-to-noise ratio relatively high. With no snark intended, it boils down to: "If you have nothing to add, don't."
- Surio 14y ago
  Two takeaways for me from today's experience: 1. >> even if I find the post or conversation interesting The "interesting" bit is important. There have been (less popular) threads where I have noticed funny for funny's sake comments being left alone. A trending topic is a dangerous topic for comments where your comments will be read by more people who are likely to feel that it does or does not add much "value". 2. >> "If you have nothing to add, don't." I don't think that sentiment can be expressed any differently, snark or not. :) You could have been more blunt too. I think that point's very valid within the HN subculture. Irony is, both these takeaways are something that one picks up "after the fact", which in itself is ironic. Ciao.

by Surio 14y ago

mmcnickle 14y ago

I don't comment much on topics where I feel I lack enough knowledge to add anything to the conversation, even if I find the post or conversation interesting. As a result, I only really comment on perhaps < 2-3% of the threads I read. I imagine this is similar to a lot of other HNers and it helps keep the signal-to-noise ratio relatively high. With no snark intended, it boils down to: "If you have nothing to add, don't."

Surio 14y ago
Two takeaways for me from today's experience: 1. >> even if I find the post or conversation interesting The "interesting" bit is important. There have been (less popular) threads where I have noticed funny for funny's sake comments being left alone. A trending topic is a dangerous topic for comments where your comments will be read by more people who are likely to feel that it does or does not add much "value". 2. >> "If you have nothing to add, don't." I don't think that sentiment can be expressed any differently, snark or not. :) You could have been more blunt too. I think that point's very valid within the HN subculture. Irony is, both these takeaways are something that one picks up "after the fact", which in itself is ironic. Ciao.