3 ms·
> Remember, ChatGPT is a machine! Same goes for HN, yet it does not take kindly to certain expressions either. I suppose the trouble is that machines do not o
by 9rx 9mo ago
> Remember, ChatGPT is a machine!
Same goes for HN, yet it does not take kindly to certain expressions either.
I suppose the trouble is that machines do not operate without human involvement, so for both HN and ChatGPT there are humans in the loop, and some of those humans are not able to separate strings of text from reality. Silly, sure, but humans are often silly. That is just the nature of the beast.
- moravak1984 9mo ago> Same goes for HN, yet it does not take kindly to certain expressions either. > I suppose the trouble is that machines do not operate without human involvement Sure, but HN has at least one human that has been taking care of it since inception and reads many (if not most) of the comments, whereas ChatGPT mostly absorbed a shiton of others' IP. I'm sure the occassional swearing does not bother the human moderators that fine-tune the thing, certainly not more than the violent, explicit images they are forced to watch in order for you to have nicer, smarter answers.
- svrtknst 9mo agoeh, words are reality. insults are just changes in air pressure but they still hurt, and being constantly subjected to negativity and harsh language would be an unpleasant work environment
- 9rx 9mo agoWords don't hurt. The intent behind those words can. But a machine doesn't carry intent. Trouble is that the irrational humans working as implementation details behind ChatGPT and HN are prone to anthropomorphizing the machine to have intent, which is not reality. Hence why such rules are in place despite being nonsensical.
- actionfromafar 9mo agoHumans are prone to being human. That's an old peeve.