3 ms·
I just don't understand this naive argument against subscription. If I have to pay same amount of money, I will pay in subscription than paying one time. So let
by YetAnotherNick 9mo ago
I just don't understand this naive argument against subscription. If I have to pay same amount of money, I will pay in subscription than paying one time. So let's say average subscription time is 2 years, they can make $400 onetime or $20/month to get the same revenue. As a consumer I will prefer the second option.
For $40 product, I will rather pay $1/month than $40 once. It keeps the incentive aligned. I think most people just assume that if the devs move away from subscription they would be fine with lower revenue and would charge less.
- ryandrake 9mo ago> So let's say average subscription time is 2 years, they can make $400 onetime or $20/month to get the same revenue. Does the software stop working after the 2 years? If so, I’d go subscription (or find another product that doesn’t explode). If it doesn’t, I’d pay the $400 assuming I want to use it for more than 2 years.
- YetAnotherNick 9mo agoI said assuming average usage of 2 years just to give example. Exact depends on product and customer segment.
- anhner 9mo agoYou wrongly assume that you are left with the SaaS product after paying for it for 2 years. For the one time payment, you will still have the software 2 years and more down the road.
- YetAnotherNick 9mo agoHere's what I said: > So let's say average subscription time It could be anything from month to decades depending on the subscription. And the price should be accordingly (risk based)adjusted for the same revenue.