3 ms·
This just shows batteries shouldn't be the only storage technology, at least at high latitude. There needs to be a complementary long term storage technology
by pfdietz 10mo ago
This just shows batteries shouldn't be the only storage technology, at least at high latitude. There needs to be a complementary long term storage technology with low capacity capex, even if its round trip efficiency is bad. Examples: green hydrogen, ultra low capex thermal storage.
To see the effect of including such, go to https://model.energy https://model.energy
Using a long term storage technology (in addition to wind/solar/batteries) can cut the cost in half at high latitudes.
- neilwilson 10mo agoThe most sensible solution is synthesised natural gas. Then we can use the existing LNG storage and plant. It’s a lot easier to store and transport than hydrogen and the capital items already exist. Curtailment fees should be replaced with purchases of green LNG.
- ViewTrick1002 9mo agoThe problem with that is how dispersed carbon atoms are in the atmosphere. Another option is ammonia, which is quite nasty to deal with.
- PunchyHamster 9mo agoWe can start with non-dispersed carbon atoms coming off industrial processes. Green hydrogen and CO2 into methane
- pfdietz 9mo agoThis is just one-time repackaging of the CO2 from fossil fuel combustion. It's not an answer.
- PunchyHamster 9mo agothere is no "answer". We will have industrial processes producing CO2. We have to deal with it, and that is one way.
- pfdietz 9mo agoThose processes have to be eliminated, yes. Now let's get back to talking about long term grid storage. Piggybacking storage on emissions that have to be eliminated obviously isn't a solution.
- pfdietz 9mo agoIt's more expensive than hydrogen because you need to capture and store the CO2 of combustion. Extracting CO2 from the atmosphere as part of the cycle would be even more prohibitively expensive.