5 ms·
Let me summarize your chain of arguments up to this point: “I don't think you really get either Design Thinking or Systems Thinking” 1. In the strict sense of
by gond 8mo ago
Let me summarize your chain of arguments up to this point:
“I don't think you really get either Design Thinking or Systems Thinking”
1. In the strict sense of science, Design Thinking is not a methodology, whether you like it or not. Look it up.
2. If you have no more arguments to offer besides falling back to accusations again and again, then I'm afraid I can't take you seriously.
- jjk166 8mo agoI'm not arguing anything here, I am trying to help you realize that you aren't talking about what you think you're talking about. I am not referring to methodology "in the strict sense of science" indeed I don't know what "in the strict sense of science" is supposed to mean. I'm using the dictionary definition of methodology: "a body of methods, rules, and ideas that are important in a science, art, or discipline : a particular procedure or set of procedures."
- gond 8mo ago> I am trying to help you Quite the opposite. You are now trying to reframe your accusations as help. 1. I surely didn’t ask for accusations nor for help with this. If I need any, I will let you know. 2. Your assessment of my situation is incorrect and as such I'm removing myself from this conversation now. But I want you to have the last word, so, go ahead.