2 ms·

These both work for me (copied from the top): https://web.archive.org/web/20250831074424/https://www.theatlantic.com/national/2010/05/askers-vs-guessers/340891

• bee_rider 8mo ago
  It’s conventional around here to share these sites. But they are basically unauthorized copies of the articles, right? IMO it is totally fair and fine to just respond to the part of the discussion that the publication decided to make publicly available.
  • pseudalopex 8mo ago
    > IMO it is totally fair and fine to just respond to the part of the discussion that the publication decided to make publicly available. This wastes the time of people who read the article.
    • bee_rider 8mo ago
      The publicly accessible article is the article, it isn’t the reader’s fault that the publisher decided to only make a little bit of it accessible to us.
      • pseudalopex 8mo ago
        > The publicly accessible article is the article No. > it isn’t the reader’s fault that the publisher decided to only make a little bit of it accessible to us. It is a commenter's fault if they comment on an article they did not read.