I'd need to see the same scrutiny applied to pre-AI papers. If a field has a poor replication rate, meaning there's a good chance that a given published paper

I'd need to see the same scrutiny applied to pre-AI papers. If a field has a poor replication rate, meaning there's a good chance that a given published paper is just so much junk science, is that better or worse than letting AI hallucinate the data in the first place?