4 ms·

I wonder if any corporations that could benefit from this project could help bankroll it (of which I assume there are many.) Wish they had a sponsorship listin

I wonder if any corporations that could benefit from this project could help bankroll it (of which I assume there are many.) Wish they had a sponsorship listing on their GH page... I poked around and couldn't find one

freedomben 9mo ago
I suspect this would be a very risky proposition for them. The expense would be enormous, so it would either need to be a player with such huge economies of scale to make it work, or it would have to be a collection of businesses that in aggregate could make it economically feasible. I would suspect in most cases, it would be a lot cheaper to just port your software to modern Linux than to try to get react OS over the line. And that's before considering that a lot of the large players will be in contract situations with Microsoft that likely directly prevent this sort of thing
- genewitch 9mo ago
  apple, nvidia, microsoft, google, facebook, amazon, broadcom(!!!!), TSMC(!), and tesla all have way more than a trillion dollars. >$1,000,000,000,000.00 They could give this project $10,000,000 per year for a decade and not notice. we're talking "slap on the wrist fine" levels of money here.
  - freedomben 9mo ago
    but why would any of those companies want to use ReactOS? They already build on top of Linux, except maybe Microsoft, but certainly Microsoft wouldn't want to fund ReactOS... If I were an executive at those places and somebody proposed ReactOS to replace our foundation, I'd assume they were joking/trolling and would laugh (and genuinely find it funny)
    - genewitch 9mo ago
      who said they need to use reactOS or "replace their foundation", which is a term i cannot parse, i don't think anyone wants to use this as a server platform (that was my default assumption of that phrase.) this is "we have a market cap of 61,271,506 times the median household income in the USA, we can afford to peel off 1/500,000th (0.0002%) of our market cap per year to make this project awesome because we like this project and want to see it grow"
      - freedomben 9mo ago
        Well if that's the case, then what you're arguing for is charity. That's fine, but the upthread topic has been about business case. If we're looking at it as charity and not a business investment, then it's a much different conversation. I'd certainly love if companies did things like this and would highly applaud it.
    - drzaiusx11 9mo ago
      There's still a ton of critical, often custom-written (read: hard to replace), corporate Windows software out there that still needs to run. If Microsoft continues their further decline of Microsoft Windows releases then a free alternative starts to look more attractive. Linux+Wine is definitely a good option today but compatibility shims add complexity and not all shops run Linux or want to.
      - genewitch 9mo ago
        i just want to program my old motorola radios without having to deal with virtualbox windows 98 VMs, you know? one can transcribe "motorola radio" for "bosch end mill from 1993" or "thermoplastic former from 1999"
  - drzaiusx11 9mo ago
    Valve has already proven that one moderately-sized corporate contributor added to your moon-shot FOSS project can get you places. (And Valve isn't anywhere near in size for the FANG+ corps you listed)
- deleted 9mo ago
  [deleted]
zamadatix 9mo ago
There's a sponsorship section but it just links to the donate page rather than a corporate focused sponsorship program. It seems most of the corporate activity in this space is around userspace compatibility rather than NT kernel compatibility, like CrossOver or Valve driving Wine and other codebases in that regard.

freedomben 9mo ago

I suspect this would be a very risky proposition for them. The expense would be enormous, so it would either need to be a player with such huge economies of scale to make it work, or it would have to be a collection of businesses that in aggregate could make it economically feasible. I would suspect in most cases, it would be a lot cheaper to just port your software to modern Linux than to try to get react OS over the line. And that's before considering that a lot of the large players will be in contract situations with Microsoft that likely directly prevent this sort of thing

genewitch 9mo ago
apple, nvidia, microsoft, google, facebook, amazon, broadcom(!!!!), TSMC(!), and tesla all have way more than a trillion dollars. >$1,000,000,000,000.00 They could give this project $10,000,000 per year for a decade and not notice. we're talking "slap on the wrist fine" levels of money here.
- freedomben 9mo ago
  but why would any of those companies want to use ReactOS? They already build on top of Linux, except maybe Microsoft, but certainly Microsoft wouldn't want to fund ReactOS... If I were an executive at those places and somebody proposed ReactOS to replace our foundation, I'd assume they were joking/trolling and would laugh (and genuinely find it funny)
  - genewitch 9mo ago
    who said they need to use reactOS or "replace their foundation", which is a term i cannot parse, i don't think anyone wants to use this as a server platform (that was my default assumption of that phrase.) this is "we have a market cap of 61,271,506 times the median household income in the USA, we can afford to peel off 1/500,000th (0.0002%) of our market cap per year to make this project awesome because we like this project and want to see it grow"
    - freedomben 9mo ago
      Well if that's the case, then what you're arguing for is charity. That's fine, but the upthread topic has been about business case. If we're looking at it as charity and not a business investment, then it's a much different conversation. I'd certainly love if companies did things like this and would highly applaud it.
  - drzaiusx11 9mo ago
    There's still a ton of critical, often custom-written (read: hard to replace), corporate Windows software out there that still needs to run. If Microsoft continues their further decline of Microsoft Windows releases then a free alternative starts to look more attractive. Linux+Wine is definitely a good option today but compatibility shims add complexity and not all shops run Linux or want to.
    - genewitch 9mo ago
      i just want to program my old motorola radios without having to deal with virtualbox windows 98 VMs, you know? one can transcribe "motorola radio" for "bosch end mill from 1993" or "thermoplastic former from 1999"
- drzaiusx11 9mo ago
  Valve has already proven that one moderately-sized corporate contributor added to your moon-shot FOSS project can get you places. (And Valve isn't anywhere near in size for the FANG+ corps you listed)
deleted 9mo ago
[deleted]

zamadatix 9mo ago

There's a sponsorship section but it just links to the donate page rather than a corporate focused sponsorship program. It seems most of the corporate activity in this space is around userspace compatibility rather than NT kernel compatibility, like CrossOver or Valve driving Wine and other codebases in that regard.