3 ms·
> I've seen an interesting behavior in India. If I ask someone on the street for directions, they will always give me an answer, even if they don't know. If the
by AndrewKemendo 9mo ago
> I've seen an interesting behavior in India. If I ask someone on the street for directions, they will always give me an answer, even if they don't know. If they don't know, they'll make something up.
Isn’t this the precise failure pattern that everybody shits on LLMs for?
- koliber 9mo agoYes.
- fakedang 9mo agoHence proved AGI = A Guy/Gal in India
- soco 9mo agoAh so that's what Anthropic's Amodei meant when saying AGI was attained - they actually reached that guy/gal.
- direwolf20 9mo agoPerhaps they meant detained.
- Nevermark 9mo agoHopefully, retained. But, a tained for sure.
- bicepjai 9mo agoThis is really funny.
- melvinmelih 9mo ago--
- AndrewKemendo 9mo agoAlmost like…technology embeds the latent behaviors of the data that produced it! Imagine that Someone should really write a paper on that (hint: it’s the entire basis of information theory)
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- chrisjj 9mo agoOnly on surface. The difference is the LLM doesn't know it doesn't know. An LLM provides the best solition it has regardless of whether that solution is in any way fit for purpose.
- DominikPeters 9mo agoIf you inspect the Chain of Thought summaries, the LLM often knows full well what it is doing.
- chrisjj 9mo agoThat's not knowing. That's just parotting in smaller chunks.