3 ms·
For 96% of the population, AI will not boost production. Generally speaking people are too stupid to use AI properly at least for awhile.
by lvl155 9mo ago
For 96% of the population, AI will not boost production. Generally speaking people are too stupid to use AI properly at least for awhile.
- TwoNineA 9mo agoI really hate condascending and arrogant stuff like "Generally speaking people are too stupid to use AI properly at least for awhile". There are plenty of tech illiterate people that are far from being "stupid" and they might not care about or like AI. They just need to send emails to family, share photos and videos and have a video call from time to time. For them, AI is worthless. But they aren't stupid. You sound like a tech bro.
- lvl155 9mo agoI am not being condescending. I am part of that 96%. I am admitting I am too stupid to use AI as it is set up right now.
- kodyo 9mo agoThat's not even the point, though. Those smart-but-not-techy people are not going to grow GDP at the pace that Satya Nadella needs them to in order to keep his KPIs going up and to the right, and he's getting pissed. That's the problem.
- BigPaPaYEAAA 9mo ago[dead]
- remix2000 9mo agoGenAI is only useful to bump terrible up to mediocre, so it'd be really stupid to spend time honing one's prompting skills. And as you noticed, so far 96% of the population agrees.
- lvl155 9mo agoIt’s really not going to bump up terribles to mediocres. It’s only going to mask the terribles and make it harder to assess intelligence and talent. Underlying human intelligence is not going to get a boost from AI. Intelligence is mostly innate. I would even argue that AI will make average humans marginally dumber for the most part.
- remix2000 9mo agoYeah, also, isn't it already proven that offloading thinking onto chat bots causes some kind of irreversible brain damage/dementia? (also BTW "mediocre" is still not "acceptable" despite Slophauses trying to convince people otherwise)