3 ms·
On the other hand, IMO this looks exactly like an XKCD style graph while all the others (including the mathematica) seemed a little off to me.
by zaptheimpaler 14y ago
On the other hand, IMO this looks exactly like an XKCD style graph while all the others (including the mathematica) seemed a little off to me.
- TeMPOraL 14y agoI'd say, a little bit too much jitter, especially in text. Some of the versions for Mathematica, et al. were a little bit closer, IMO.
- pygy_ 14y agoThe text is just a matter of font. The rendering of the graphs look exactly like the original, and that's the hard part. Edit: as pointed out below, the algorithm was lifted from another version done in Python/Matplotlib by Jake Vanderplas: http://jakevdp.github.com/blog/2012/10/07/xkcd-style-plots-in-matplotlib/ http://jakevdp.github.com/blog/2012/10/07/xkcd-style-plots-i...
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- pygy_ 14y agoThe edit window is now closed, but I realised that the font he uses is Humor Sans, which is based on Randal Munroe's handwriting (the author of XKCD). http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2009/03/xkcdsucks-is-proud-to-present-humor.html http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2009/03/xkcdsucks-is-proud-to-...
- richardwhiuk 14y agoI'd agree that the font is too much - it's bordering on illegible for me in Chrome 22 on Win 7.
- pygy_ 14y agoIt is badly hinted and thus badly anti-aliased.