3 ms·
But why should one expect no future improvement in training costs (all else being equal) from Moore's Law, never mind any future use of eg. more efficient algor
by leoc 9mo ago
But why should one expect no future improvement in training costs (all else being equal) from Moore's Law, never mind any future use of eg. more efficient algorithms or more specialised hardware?
- lovich 9mo agoIf you are quoting Moore's Law in 2026 as the reason LLMs will be profitable, I don’t know how to interact with you. I guess we’ll make up the losses per unit at scale, and grow to infinity.
- leoc 9mo agoI'm not making some general claim about LLMs being profitable. To be clear, are you claiming with high confidence that LLM training costs will show no meaningful reduction, for some fixed quality, over roughly the next 10 years?