> proposed above as a solution to public IPv4 address exhaustion. It was not proposed as a solution (although, it would work). I'm pointing out that in network

> proposed above as a solution to public IPv4 address exhaustion. It was not proposed as a solution (although, it would work). I'm pointing out that in networking many names are conflated/used generally against their specific definition. NAT/Firewall; Router/Access Point/Gateway; etc.